Uncategorised

The Revolution is in Time

In this piece I am thinking about the fact that the unequal distribution of TIME seems to be a crucial factor in our often distorted relationships with our BODIES.

Rodin: The Burghers of Calais

Rodin: The Burghers of Calais

Most of the advice about how we can understand ourselves better and live from our bodies involves having time: to think, dream, reflect, have ideas, notice things, experience pleasure, sit with pain, etc. Kate McCombs for example, in this excellent blog, offers some solid strategies for self-care that touch on most of these. Much of this makes total sense to me, but also I never get around to taking it because I don’t ‘have time’.

So time seems to me to be a fundamental aspect of the whole body thing, and a systemic issue which needs to be tackled urgently if we want to get past blaming ourselves for all of our so-called failings.

In activism there is much talk about where we put our money (e.g. boycotting certain companies because we disagree with their ethics, politics and/or working practices). But might it not be just as, if not even more, revolutionary to talk about where we put our time? After all, at least in capitalist structures, the two are intimately linked.

To varying degrees across countries, cultures and economic status, we all spend time on either paid work, unpaid work, leisure/consumption, or sleep (at least according to Jonathan Gershuny’s analysis of time-use, 2000)[1]. Our time-budget is finite: we all have 24 hours in a day. Within this, do we choose to spend time, for example

    • with our children
    • with our friends
    • with our parents, grandparents, family
    • on a protest march
    • walking rather than driving
    • taking a train rather than flying
    • volunteering
    • repairing something
    • going to a local council meeting
    • attending a neighbourhood festival
    • helping someone with a task
    • listening to someone we don’t know (yet)
    • learning a new skill
    • making something without wanting to gain profit from the results
    • listening to our body and what it needs
    • giving our body what it needs (sleep, movement, sex, food, solitude)
    • having a little think without the goal of solving a problem
    • dreaming, planning, reflecting on the world

?

‘Choice’ is of course a loaded word here: The choices to be made about time are tied up with money, and they can involve significant, sometimes impossible, risk to our livelihood, social status, and sense of self.

There will be those of us who have no choice but to repair something because they cannot afford to buy a replacement, which in turn might mean that they spend less time with their children. There will be those of us who cannot even contemplate most of what is on the list because their financial and family situation do not allow it. There will be those of us whose employment operates so much on the urgency of competing that every pocket of time must immediately be allocated to an activity that will give them an edge over their competitors, or risk dropping out. There will also be those of us who are drowning in time — who, for example, cannot work or participate in social activities for various reasons, and who can become paralyzed by feelings of ‘purposelessness’ if the only way to define purpose is according to how much an individual contributes to the machienery of labour and consumption.

Those things that drop off the list are frequently those associated with self-care and communal being (human beings rather than human doings, as Omid Safi writes).

The individuals who drive our organizational structures from the top are well informed of the benefits of self-care practices, and in principle they want their workers and citizens to stay healthy, operate at optimum productivity, be personable, and perhaps even have the ability to think creatively. The solution to the increasing sense of time-poverty that many of us experience is thus generally the advice to become better at time-management: figure out where time is being wasted, what your most productive hours are, how you can delegate — how you can, ultimately, perform the magic trick of making your 24 hours seem like MORE TIME.[2]

photo 3

Not-so-secretly, we all know that this is not possible. We are increasingly aware that the way time is organized in our current system is not sustainable for most of us. But we have little time to think of an alternative solution, and are generally made to feel that, if we can’t manage, this is down to our individual failing and the ‘choices’ we have individually made. This of course is a wonderful way of sustaining the status quo.

Taking time or making time are phrases that present an illusion of choice — they are a matter of choice to the same degree that shaving or not shaving your legs is a ‘choice’ for someone socialised as female. What we choose to do with our time has profound and potentially dangerous consequences, perhaps more so than anything else we can do. Perhaps a number of us — perhaps a large number of us — can risk to make more radical choices about how we spend our time. But in addition to this, for a real, profound change of direction to happen in how we can live sustainably as human beings in time, we need a radical reorganization of the systems within which we live.

So let’s put ‘time’ at the top of our manifestos. Time to make plans, form ideas, rest, play, listen, take in, digest. Let’s aim for a utopia of time that is nothing less than what we deserve, that is just as crucial as the utopia of world peace and equality, and see what we can get. Let’s give considered attention to time when we make any plans to improve our collective economic and social situation. Maybe the messy uncertainty of leaving the EU is the perfect space in which to push for such changes. It is in re-distributing time that the revolution happens.

 

 

 

More about Time?

A huge amount of literature deals with the subject of time, in various ways. Here are just some tiny titbits:

      • Eva Hoffman’s Time and Simon Garfield’s Timekeepers offer two very different but equally thoughtful and funny overviews of our dealings with time.
      • Jonathan Gershun’s Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Postindustrial Society gives a economic-sociological insight into time-use from the 1960s to 1990s across 22 countries.
      • Vu Le on Time Inequity gives some useful practical suggestions how institutions might use marginalized communities’ time more equitably.
      • Omid Safi writes on The disease of being busy and invites us to ask each other: how is your heart doing?.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] For the purpose of this discussion, let us assume that activism is a form of unpaid work

[2] There is plenty of research that shows that leisure/consumption time has in fact increased over the last few decades. His analysis does not however take into account the rise of zero-hours contracts and of a freelance economy, both of which profoundly affect the way in which the stresses of paid labour infiltrate all of our other time, and the degree of unpaid labour involved in gaining and sustaining this type of paid labour.

Read more →

Here’s Hoping

A3_HeresHoping_2.0

 

Times are tough and the news is grim. Daisy and Pablo were in need of some hope, so they thought they should make a show about it. They wanted it to be a show about the triumph of hope, but it turned out that things are not as simple as that. They are knotted and complex. Hope and hopelessness hold hands. So this is a show about determination and resilience, about not giving up, about keeping going despite the odds. Hope is hard work, and it’s even harder when you go it alone – but perhaps something will happen if we’re all in a room together. Here’s hoping…

In early summer 2016, Pablo and Daisy of Accidental Collective approached me to work with them on their show about hope. Their timing was superb. For various reasons, as an artist, as a human, as a British and a European citizen, I was finding hope hard to come by.
On the 23rd of June, baffled along with everyone else about what might happen next, I wrote to both of them — ‘This is it: the stakes have gone up’
And so we started.
And so we started to discover, remember, dismantle and reassemble everything we thought we knew about hope.

It has felt right to take the time to do so, right now.
For each of you, hope will mean something different. Perhaps, if you are a bit like me, you are worried sometimes that you don’t know what your hopes are. Or that you are hoping for the wrong thing. It’s a risk.
Perhaps you are sure of your hopes, but exhausted by the effort, because when we hope we are working hard,
to imagine something that isn’t there yet.
For me, that makes theatre an act of hope.

Not the only one. But an important one nonetheless, because how can we hope without having imagination, and where better to imagine together?

So I hope you keep coming, dear audience. Please keep coming to the theatre and all kinds of performance in strange places. Bring your friends and family or come alone. Come if you’ve never come before. Keep coming even if the last thing you saw was rubbish. We’re all trying things out.
Maybe, as Pablo and Daisy say, something will happen if we’re all in a room together.
You are always invited; you are always welcome.
We couldn’t do it without you.

To finish, with thanks to my treasured fellow-maker Benjamin Mosse for sending me Hope in the Dark when I needed it, here is a very wise woman on hope:

‘Hope locates itself in the premises that we don’t know what will happen and that in the spaciousness of uncertainty is room to act. When you recognize uncertainty, you recognize that you may be able to influence the outcomes — you alone or you in concert with a few dozen or several million others. Hope is an embrace of the unknown and the unknowable, an alternative to the certainty of both optimists and pessimists. Optimists think it will all be fine without our involvement; pessimists take the opposite position; both excuse themselves from acting. It’s the belief that what we do matters even though how and when it may matter, who and what it may impact, are not things we can know beforehand. We may not, in fact, know them afterward either, but they matter all the same’. (Rebecca Solnit, Hope in the Dark, p.XIV)

Performance Dates for Here’s Hoping:

2-3 September at the Theatre Royal Margate

26-29 October Ovalhouse, London

Read more →

Watch the Webinar: Roanna in discussion with Dr Mark Seton.

 

Image courtesy of Dr Mark Seton

Image courtesy of Dr Mark Seton

I have recently published an article on crises of the body in actor training, called ‘The Body That Fits The Bill‘ This is as part of a special edition of the peer reviewed journal About Performance, focused on The Lives of Actors.

To accompany this issue, Dr Mark Seton is running an informative, interactive and free series of Webinars, to which I have contributed with a discussion titled: ‘Is Your Body Really Yours?’ (Note that in the unlikely event that you might wish to fast-forward through sections, you can do so by clicking the YouTube icon in the bottom right corner and viewing the webinar in that format)

You can join any seminar live and type in questions or comment through a chat room.

Or, if you have missed them live, you can catch up here: http://www.senseconnexion.com/livesofactors/

Here are the full details of the Webinar programme, which I thoroughly recommend for actors and those who work with them:

FREE WEBINAR SERIES ON THE LIVES OF ACTORS
What are actors’ lives like? What kinds of experiences, over the course of a career, do actors have? How does their training prepare them both for the work they will find, and for the lives that they will lead as they pursue that work? The focus of the publication About Performance: The Lives of Actors has been to open up a range of conversations. Dr Mark Seton and Assoc Prof Ian Maxwell invited contributors (from the UK, USA, and around Australia) to submit essays reporting on research into actors’ lives, their wellbeing and the impact of their creative work upon their lives, their health, and their relationships. In this free, weekly webinar series over 9 weeks, commencing Tuesday 21st July 2015, Dr Seton will interview various contributors about what they found in their research and why it matters to the lives of actors today – these live webinar session will include time for questions and answers from those who register online. If you miss any episode, they will be available to view online after the original broadcast. To get more details about each episode and register to attend online, go to www.senseconnexion.com/livesofactors/

 

Read more →